
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 11:36:59 +0200 Hans de Goede hdegoede@redhat.com wrote:
From: Stefan Roese sr@denx.de
There have been 3 versions of the sunxi_emac support patch during its development. Somehow version 2 ended up in upstream u-boot where as the u-boot-sunxi git repo got version 3.
This bumps the version in upstream u-boot to version 3 of the patch:
- Initialize MII clock earlier so mii access to allow independent use
- Name change from WEMAC to EMAC to match mainline kernel & chip manual
- Cosmetic code cleanup
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese sr@denx.de Signed-off-by: Henrik Nordstrom henrik@henriknordstrom.net Signed-off-by: Oliver Schinagl oliver@schinagl.nl Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdegoede@redhat.com Acked-by: Ian Campbell ijc@hellion.org.uk
Shouldn't the cosmetic and functional changes be normally split into separate patches? Indeed, it looks like the move of
+ /* Set MII clock */ + clrsetbits_le32(®s->mac_mcfg, 0xf << 2, 0xd << 2);
is the only functional change in this rather large patch.
And could you please elaborate on
- Initialize MII clock earlier so mii access to allow independent use
was this causing any user visible problems?