On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Roger Quadros rogerq@ti.com wrote:
On 26/01/17 19:33, menon.nishanth@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/include/configs/ti_omap5_common.h b/include/configs/ti_omap5_common.h index 6de19c2..1fa2f82 100644 --- a/include/configs/ti_omap5_common.h +++ b/include/configs/ti_omap5_common.h @@ -91,16 +91,22 @@ "setenv fdtfile am57xx-beagle-x15.dtb; fi;" \ "if test $board_name = beagle_x15_revb1; then " \ "setenv fdtfile am57xx-beagle-x15-revb1.dtb; fi;" \
"if test $board_name = am572x_idk; then " \"setenv fdtfile am572x-idk.dtb; fi;" \ "if test $board_name = am57xx_evm; then " \ "setenv fdtfile am57xx-beagle-x15.dtb; fi;" \ "if test $board_name = am57xx_evm_reva3; then " \ "setenv fdtfile am57xx-beagle-x15.dtb; fi;" \
"if test $board_name = am572x_idk && test $idk_lcd = no; then " \"setenv fdtfile am572x-idk.dtb; fi;" \"if test $board_name = am572x_idk && test $idk_lcd = osd101t2045; then " \"setenv fdtfile am572x-idk-lcd-osd.dtb; fi;" \"if test $board_name = am572x_idk && test $idk_lcd = osd101t2587; then " \"setenv fdtfile am572x-idk-lcd-osd101t2587.dtb; fi;" \ "if test $board_name = am571x_idk && test $idk_lcd = no; then " \ "setenv fdtfile am571x-idk.dtb; fi;" \ "if test $board_name = am571x_idk && test $idk_lcd = osd101t2045; then " \ "setenv fdtfile am571x-idk-lcd-osd.dtb; fi;" \"if test $board_name = am571x_idk && test $idk_lcd = osd101t2587; then " \"setenv fdtfile am571x-idk-lcd-osd101t2587.dtb; fi;" \please drop the fdt selection from your patches. upstream will be using dt overlay for these variations. rest of the detection code is ok to go.
OK. Just to clarify, dt overlay code will use the idk_lcd variable to patch the DT right?
That'd make sense.
Regards, Nishanth Menon