Dear Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear dirk.behme@googlemail.com,
In message 4919a022.1f205e0a.2f5b.ffffc570@mx.google.com you wrote:
Update ARM's if then else logic.
examples/Makefile | 6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Hm... wouldn't it make sense to explicitely state against which repository this patch (and all other of your patches) was (were) made resp. where you want to have it added?
Hm, I think this info is already there? Have you noticed the "[PATCH-OMAP3] OMAP3" in subject? Having this identifier in subject is the way Jean-Christophe likes to have patches for u-boot-arm/omap3 [1] [2] marked.
Regarding my pending patches, there is one exception and this is
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2008-November/043220.html
This is for (u-boot-arm) mainline as expressed by "ARM" in subject. As mentioned in note of this patch, I did it against mainline cause u-boot-arm wasn't in sync with mainline while creating that patch. But as u-boot-arm is in sync with mainline again now, it should apply there, too.
Best regards
Dirk
[1] http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2008-November/042897.html
[2] http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-arm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/omap3