Hello ksi,
ksi@koi8.net wrote:
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009, Heiko Schocher wrote:
ksi@koi8.net wrote:
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009, Heiko Schocher wrote:
ksi@koi8.net wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Heiko Schocher wrote:
ksi@koi8.net wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Kubushyn ksi@koi8.net > --- > diff -purN u-boot-i2c.orig/drivers/i2c/soft_i2c.c u-boot-i2c/drivers/i2c/soft_i2c.c > --- u-boot-i2c.orig/drivers/i2c/soft_i2c.c 2009-02-12 10:43:41.000000000 -0800 > +++ u-boot-i2c/drivers/i2c/soft_i2c.c 2009-02-12 10:46:00.000000000 -0800 > @@ -1,4 +1,8 @@ > /* > + * Copyright (c) 2009 Sergey Kubushyn ksi@koi8.net > + * > + * Changes for multibus/multiadapter I2C support. > + * > * (C) Copyright 2001, 2002 > * Wolfgang Denk, DENX Software Engineering, wd@denx.de. >
[...]
Yes, good point. But do we need more then one i2c adapter when running from flash? I see only one reason to use i2c when running from flash: accessing SPD EEprom ... and this "bus" could always be the first hw adapter. All other accesses to i2c should be moved to run when we are in ram.
You can have, e.g. TWO SPD EEPROMs on different busses. And please remember that infamous "640K ought to be enough for anybody..."
OK, if we really need this.
bye Heiko