Hi Pali,
On Sun, 23 Jan 2022 at 07:57, Pali Rohár pali@kernel.org wrote:
On Sunday 23 January 2022 07:36:22 Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Pali,
On Sun, 23 Jan 2022 at 07:08, Pali Rohár pali@kernel.org wrote:
- Maemo
On Sunday 23 January 2022 07:04:03 Simon Glass wrote:
Drop this code which uses a header that is about to be deleted.
And what / where is the replacement?
This is DM_VIDEO. There are quite a few example drivers in drivers/video - perhaps the mxsfb.c one is a reasonable example. See the top of video_uclass.c for how frame-buffer allocation works.
I have already WIP patches for usage of video-uclass.c but because reviewing of N900 patches is slow, I have not sent them yet.
Who is reviewing them? If you send the patches I can review them and we can get them applied for this release.
So could you please do NOT remove N900 support? I would really appreciative for reviewing pending patches instead of sending patches with board removal.
This is not a board removal, just dropping a feature.
Note that there is some issue with video_post_bind(), it throws false-positive error "Video device '%s' cannot allocate frame buffer memory" with "return -ENOSPC". If I remove that "return -ENOSPC" it is working fine.
Do you need U-Boot to allocate the frame buffer. If so, this is likely because your driver is not bound before relocation. See the comment around that message in the code.
Regards, Simon