The 16-bit detection conflicts with http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-November/064139.html
Which way should I resolve the conflict? Or does one of you want to
respin?
I don't see 16BIT/2KPAGE/get_nfc_info defined for MX31... and does MX25 share MX27's imx-regs.h?
I think it would be nice to keep all MXC-NAND-stuff in the driver, that includes the IS_16BIT and other routines.
It is fine with me to keep things that use only registers in the mxc in the driver. Other stuff should be factored out into imx-regs.h
mx25 and mx27 do not share an imx-regs.h but bot have one. My thinking was that a future patch could have mx31 rename its imx31-regs.h to imx-regs.h so they could all be consistent.
Magnus, can you test this patch on MX31?
Yes, but I'm not sure when. Wednesday or Thursday perhaps.
/Magnus