Re: [U-Boot] CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT still used?

...

In regard to CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT I've hit a typo in arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/start.S while trying to use this define to build a non relocatable u-boot. In line 383 there is

ldr pc, r0

which seems to should be

ldr pc, [r0]

I don't think it should. r0 is computed to be the address at which to branch, so the branch there is direct, not indirect. That could be changed to "mov pc, r0" for clarity, though.

binutils 2.20.1 doesn't like "ldr pc, r0". So then it must be "mov pc, r0" if "ldr pc, [r0]" is wrong.

And above I used the wrong define, this code is only active when

CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC is defined.

Regards, Alexander