On 5/6/23 21:11, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 at 13:05, Eugen Hristev eugen.hristev@collabora.com wrote:
From: Joseph Chen chenjh@rock-chips.com
Add the node for PCIe 2x1l 2 device together with the corresponding combphy.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Chen chenjh@rock-chips.com [eugen.hristev@collabora.com: moved to -u-boot.dtsi, minor adaptations] Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev eugen.hristev@collabora.com [jonas@kwiboo.se: adapt to kernel node] Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman jonas@kwiboo.se
Changes in v3:
- s/pciE/PCIe/
Changes in v2:
- add compliance with linux by Jonas
arch/arm/dts/rk3588s-u-boot.dtsi | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/rk3588s-u-boot.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/rk3588s-u-boot.dtsi index ad652c02e58e..6385da1471a5 100644 --- a/arch/arm/dts/rk3588s-u-boot.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/dts/rk3588s-u-boot.dtsi @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ */
#include "rockchip-u-boot.dtsi" +#include <dt-bindings/phy/phy.h>
/ { dmc { @@ -58,6 +59,11 @@ reg = <0x0 0xfd58a000 0x0 0x2000>; };
pipe_phy0_grf: syscon@fd5bc000 {compatible = "rockchip,pipe-phy-grf", "syscon";reg = <0x0 0xfd5bc000 0x0 0x100>;};usb2phy2_grf: syscon@fd5d8000 { compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-usb2phy-grf", "syscon", "simple-mfd";@@ -104,6 +110,61 @@ }; };
pcie2x1l2: pcie@fe190000 {compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-pcie", "snps,dw-pcie";#address-cells = <3>;#size-cells = <2>;bus-range = <0x40 0x4f>;clocks = <&cru ACLK_PCIE_1L2_MSTR>, <&cru ACLK_PCIE_1L2_SLV>,<&cru ACLK_PCIE_1L2_DBI>, <&cru PCLK_PCIE_1L2>,<&cru CLK_PCIE_AUX4>, <&cru CLK_PCIE1L2_PIPE>;clock-names = "aclk_mst", "aclk_slv","aclk_dbi", "pclk","aux", "pipe";device_type = "pci";interrupts = <GIC_SPI 253 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>,<GIC_SPI 252 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>,<GIC_SPI 251 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>,<GIC_SPI 250 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>,<GIC_SPI 249 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;interrupt-names = "sys", "pmc", "msg", "legacy", "err";#interrupt-cells = <1>;interrupt-map-mask = <0 0 0 7>;interrupt-map = <0 0 0 1 &pcie2x1l2_intc 0>,<0 0 0 2 &pcie2x1l2_intc 1>,<0 0 0 3 &pcie2x1l2_intc 2>,<0 0 0 4 &pcie2x1l2_intc 3>;linux,pci-domain = <4>;num-ib-windows = <8>;num-ob-windows = <8>;num-viewport = <4>;max-link-speed = <2>;msi-map = <0x4000 &gic 0x4000 0x1000>;num-lanes = <1>;phys = <&combphy0_ps PHY_TYPE_PCIE>;phy-names = "pcie-phy";power-domains = <&power RK3588_PD_PCIE>;ranges = <0x01000000 0x0 0xf4100000 0x0 0xf4100000 0x0 0x00100000>,<0x02000000 0x0 0xf4200000 0x0 0xf4200000 0x0 0x00e00000>,<0x03000000 0x0 0x40000000 0xa 0x00000000 0x0 0x40000000>;reg = <0xa 0x41000000 0x0 0x00400000>,<0x0 0xfe190000 0x0 0x00010000>,<0x0 0xf4000000 0x0 0x00100000>;reg-names = "dbi", "apb", "config";resets = <&cru SRST_PCIE4_POWER_UP>, <&cru SRST_P_PCIE4>;reset-names = "pcie", "periph";rockchip,pipe-grf = <&php_grf>;status = "disabled";pcie2x1l2_intc: legacy-interrupt-controller {interrupt-controller;#address-cells = <0>;#interrupt-cells = <1>;interrupt-parent = <&gic>;interrupts = <GIC_SPI 250 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING 0>;};};Look like we are growing non-linux dt in -u-boot.dtsi. This might not be a good choice in the long run. I understand the importance of this SoC but code maintenance must be in a generic way.
Hi Jagan,
In particular the pci express is already on its way to upstream Linux, at which moment the nodes here will be removed. And in general, we cannot really hold U-boot development because Linux is a little behind. Things will settle once there will be more things taken into Linux. In the long run, there will be nothing in the non-linux dt.
Eugen
Thanks, Jagan.