Hi Jon,
On 6 August 2014 07:56, Jon Loeliger loeliger@gmail.com wrote:
And these, as you said I think, are HW description things that should be included in the master DT file upstream, right?
Well we only need them because we are added 'reg' properties to the subnodes. There would certainly be no harm in including them upstream. The only bad thing I'm doing is the 'Replicate the ordering' bit. That should just go away once the GPIO numbering doesn't matter anymore (which requires that we use the device tree binding in GPIOs - this is the next step!).
HI Simon,
I'm trying to understand what you are saying here. Specifically, is this your solution to the GPIO renumbering problem that I've droning on and on about?
No this is unrelated. The existing exynos4 code defines the GPIOs in a particular order, and the DT has them in a different order (and there are not aliases to change it). So it's really just a work-around until we can get away from having GPIO defines in exynos.
Regards, Simon