Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
In message 20090718144826.GC30699@game.jcrosoft.org you wrote:
Funny. You first post a patch, then only then bother to discuss the topic.
the patch was send after :)
Well, hard facts tell a different story:
Patch: ... Received: from ns32433.ovh.net (HELO localhost) (plagnioj%jcrosoft.com@213.251.161.87) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 18 Jul 2009 10:58:33 -0000 Message-id: 1247914560-30501-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com
Note that "1247914560" = Sat Jul 18 12:56:00 2009
... Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] i2c: use for CONFIGs a common naming convention CONFIG_I2C From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagnioj@jcrosoft.com Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 12:56:00 +0200 To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Proposal: ... Received: from ns32433.ovh.net (HELO localhost) (plagnioj%jcrosoft.com@213.251.161.87) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 18 Jul 2009 11:06:09 -0000 Message-id: 20090718110338.GA30699@game.jcrosoft.org ... Subject: [RFC] CONFI# G naming convetion From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagnioj@jcrosoft.com Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:03:38 +0200 To: U-Boot u-boot@lists.denx.de
The Date: header and internal timestamps (Messag-ID) clearly show that the patch was sent 5 minutes before the proposal.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk