Dear Otavio Salvador,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Otavio Salvador
otavio@ossystems.com.br wrote:
I prefer to have this as is and share documentation with mx28. The NAND ought to be done providing same interface so one doc for it all. I think change it in next version is wrong and confuse users.
Ping?
We won't be able to get rid of mxsboot for NAND use-case so I'd prefer to have it for SD as well. For me it does not matter much as I use OE and it automates it all; but for ordinary user it is important to it to be consistent so all 'mxs' SoC would work same way from user point of view.
If we find a better way of doing things in future we can base on this and improve it later but please let's get it in and move forward...
Does my proposed patch not work for you? (the one which shifts the bootstream payload to block 4 in partition 1)
Best regards, Marek Vasut