On 2/7/23 01:00, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 12:54:03AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 2/6/23 01:53, Simon Glass wrote:
This converts 3 usages of this option to the non-SPL form, since there is no SPL_CMD_BOOTEFI_BOOTMGR defined in Kconfig
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
(no changes since v1)
boot/Makefile | 2 +- cmd/bootmenu.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/boot/Makefile b/boot/Makefile index 69c31adb77d..73b5b19816b 100644 --- a/boot/Makefile +++ b/boot/Makefile @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_TPL_)BOOTMETH_EFILOADER) += bootmeth_efi.o obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_TPL_)BOOTMETH_SANDBOX) += bootmeth_sandbox.o obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_TPL_)BOOTMETH_SCRIPT) += bootmeth_script.o ifdef CONFIG_$(SPL_TPL_)BOOTSTD_FULL -obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_TPL_)CMD_BOOTEFI_BOOTMGR) += bootmeth_efi_mgr.o +obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI_BOOTMGR) += bootmeth_efi_mgr.o obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_TPL_)BOOTSTD) += bootflow_menu.o endif diff --git a/cmd/bootmenu.c b/cmd/bootmenu.c index 3236ca5d799..422ab411252 100644 --- a/cmd/bootmenu.c +++ b/cmd/bootmenu.c @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static int prepare_bootmenu_entry(struct bootmenu_data *menu, return 1; } -#if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(CMD_BOOTEFI_BOOTMGR)) && (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(CMD_EFICONFIG)) +#if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI_BOOTMGR)) && (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(CMD_EFICONFIG))
There is no reason whatsoever for using different macros for the two options.
Here and elsewhere, one CONFIG is being fixed at a time. If at the end of the series this is not fixed, then that's an issue to address.
This cannot be reviewed easily. I never received the complete series.
CONFIG_IS_ENABLED() is more restrictive than IS_ENABLED(). No motivation is provided why the condition should be relaxed in the commit message.
Cover-letters are not in the commit history. But anyway the cover-letter does not provide any motivation for the change either.
NAK to this patch.
Best regards
Heinrich