Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Just to give a datapoint for speed:
measured on TQM5200 (MPC5200 at 400 MHz, environment size 16 kB):
OLD implementation:
=> sete ttt 'date;for i in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ; do for j in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ; do for k in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ; do run tt ; done ; done ; done;date' => sete tt 'sete var1 xxx;sete var2 ${var1};sete var1 ${var2};sete var1;sete var2' => run tt => run ttt Date: 1910-07-17 (unknown day) Time: 22:02:31 Date: 1910-07-17 (unknown day) Time: 22:03:27
New implementation:
=> run ttt Date: 1910-07-17 (unknown day) Time: 20:45:51 Date: 1910-07-17 (unknown day) Time: 20:45:53
<joke>I'd propose a contest for the most hilarious use of a BOOTLOADER.....</joke>
But, how does the timing look in the current implementation when the CRC calculation is done only in the saveenv command?
Best Regards, Reinhard