Dear Tom,
In message 20170927143112.GT3112@bill-the-cat you wrote:
Well, NAK. When you passed the "benevolent dictator" hat over, you passed it over. I value your input, and I don't lightly over-rule feedback. So, lets summarize things:
These are all technical arguments. You could have raised these in the ongoing discussion. If they are good, convincing arguments, you should have no problems to have them accepted.
What I'm complainiung about is not WHAT was commited, but HOW it was committed.
Marek wrote:
| I believe we have a well-established process of submitting patches, | getting a review and then applying them. If the head maintainer doesn't | follow the process, why should anyone else ?
You have a role model function. Please stick to the rules!
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk