Dear "Gupta, Ajay Kumar",
In message 19F8576C6E063C45BE387C64729E7394044A775FE3@dbde02.ent.ti.com you wrote:
u32 reserved[0x20]; u32 intclrr; u32 intmskr; u32 intmsksetr;};
Shouldn't this be reserved[0x20/4] ?
Yes, this is a bug. Though the correct fix is,
- u32 reserved[0x20];
- u32 reserved[5];
Umm...
Please refer musb Davinci (DM6446) document (page-74) at, http://focus.ti.com/lit/ug/sprue35f/sprue35f.pdf
-->4h CTRLR Control Register Section 4.1 8h STATR Status Register Section 4.2 10h RNDISR RNDIS Register Section 4.3 14h AUTOREQ Autorequest Register Section 4.4 20h INTSRCR USB Interrupt Source Register Section 4.5 24h INTSETR USB Interrupt Source Set Register Section 4.6 -->28h INTCLRR USB Interrupt Source Clear Register
Why don't we add these fields to he struct above if they are not actually reserved, but have a documented use?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk