Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Motorola i.MX support (1/2)

Steven Scholz wrote:

Sascha Hauer wrote:

...

I've just had a look at the i.MX (MC9328 MX1, or however this thing is called) Port in current CVS. The main differences are:

• Like Robert said, my patch introduces less duplication of code
• the serial driver in CVS supports only a fixed (hardcoded) baudrate
• the architecture include file from cvs only has register definitions while my port also has bitmasks for most registers as well as a convenience function imx_gpio_mode which lets you set the gpio primary/alternate functions without having to play with hex values.
• different boards supported. Two custom boards <-> MX1ADS. Adding support for MX1ADS should be no problem, though, since we only have to rewrite some register definitions. Unfortunately I don't have the hardware.

We will have one in the next few days. I'd love to help testing it.

I just got my brand new toy! :o)

So any news on the U-Boot i.MX support?

Steven