Dear Sam,
in message 20040503155816.12658.qmail@web15203.mail.bjs.yahoo.com you wrote:
Before sending the patch,I need to consult with you a couple of points.First is the new board name.I prefer to give a new name,lite_dw.Actually,it is DW version
Sorry, but there are too mane "lite" boards already. We need a more distinctive name.
So the possible name could be RPXlite_DW or lite_dw.In Linux kernel tree,it can be found as RPXlite_DW.But I
If the Linux kernel tree uses RPXlite_DW, then this is what we should use, too. I think it is a very good idea to use the same name when- ever possible.
Secondly,I'd like to support the following features on this board for the moment.
- LCD panel support;
This can be done as two build targets, like the TQM823L_config and TQM823L_LCD_config.
- 64MHz/48MHz system clock options;
If possible, make it automatically detect the clock frequency and auto-adjust. Your users will praise you if the same binary image works on both configurations.
- ENV_IS_IN_FLASH/ENV_IS_IN_NVRAM;
Either make it a different build targets, or select a standard configuration and let the user decide to modify the board config file.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk