Re: [U-Boot] BSS footprint of FAT very high - SPL issues

Hi Aneesh,

Le 03/02/2011 11:38, Aneesh V a écrit :

On second thoughts I would like to keep the entire bss in SDRAM. With MMC and FAT support, the SPL is already nearing the IRAM budget in OMAP3. It helps to save some space by moving out bss to SDRAM.

If needed, I can fix up the start.S by defining something like _end_of_data. But is that really needed. I do not see any SPL that needs relocation and SDRAM bss at the same time.

"Patches Welcome" :) -- with added thanks for patching all start.S / u-boot.lds in the ARM arch consistently.

Best regards, Aneesh

Amicalement,