21 Oct
2008
21 Oct
'08
5:29 p.m.
On Oct 21, 2008, at 10:06 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message <A16160A4-977E-48A0-83D1- FBAB41E1C0B6@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote:
If this is desired to be configurable should I introduce a pci_addr_t/ pci_size_t? Coupling to phys_addr_t/phys_size_t doesn't make sense to me because its perfectly reasonable to have a 64-bit PCI device work in a 32-bit system.
I think using pci_addr_t/pci_size_t is the most reasonable suggestion, then (but it may turn into fighting a lot of new warnings about incompatible types for one board or another).
Ok, I'll switch over to these types and post a new patch.
- k