On 07/08/2017 11:08 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
On 7 July 2017 at 18:32, Grygorii Strashko grygorii.strashko@ti.com wrote:
On 07/06/2017 10:58 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
On 26 June 2017 at 18:12, Grygorii Strashko grygorii.strashko@ti.com wrote:
From: Mugunthan V N mugunthanvnm@ti.com
nand_info is used all over the file so abstract it with get_nand_dev_by_index() which will help for DM conversion.
Signed-off-by: Mugunthan V N mugunthanvnm@ti.com Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko grygorii.strashko@ti.com
cmd/nand.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- drivers/mtd/nand/nand.c | 21 ++++++++++---- drivers/mtd/nand/omap_gpmc.c | 7 ++--- include/nand.h | 9 ++++++ 4 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
Is there a cover letter for this series please? I'm not sure what it does overall, or what your approach is.
It should be and you are in cc, here is the link for your reference: https://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg254409.html
OK, thank you. In a future series do you plan to remove nand_info[] ?
Its usage expected to be limited to non-DM case only - after full conversation of all platforms to DM it can be removed.
Ref: - last: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/722282/ - old: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/604739/