
19 Jan
2009
19 Jan
'09
3:32 p.m.
Dear Wolfgang,
You are right, the patch was ugly. The new one seems to be better.
Signed-off-by: Valeriy Glushkov gvv@lstec.com --- diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand.c index 700d21d..8ac53e0 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand.c @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ #define CFG_NAND_BASE_LIST { CFG_NAND_BASE } #endif
+DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR; + int nand_curr_device = -1; nand_info_t nand_info[CFG_MAX_NAND_DEVICE];
@@ -48,6 +50,8 @@ static void nand_init_chip(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *nand, if (nand_scan(mtd, 1) == 0) { if (!mtd->name) mtd->name = (char *)default_nand_name; + else + mtd->name += gd->reloc_off; } else mtd->name = NULL; } else {
--
1.5.2.5