On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 07:48 +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
On 10.09.2013 22:24, Scott Wood wrote:
On Sat, 2013-09-07 at 14:11 +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
On 04.09.2013 16:16, Paul Burton wrote:
This patchset corrects a few issues I've had whilst using UBI with U-boot.
The first 3 are bug fixes, the 4th is an addition I needed in order to write a large root filesystem into my NAND device.
Changes since v1:
- Fixed style issues in "cmd_ubi: add write.part command..." as per Stefan Roese's comments.
- Expanded upon the condition patch 1 fixes in response to the queries from Stefan, see the commit message for further detail.
- Added patch 3 "cmd_ubi: use int64_t volume size for 'ubi create'" which it seems appropriate to include in this series.
Paul Burton (4): mtd: driver _read() returns max_bitflips; mtd_read() returns -EUCLEAN cmd_mtdparts: use 64 bits for flash size, partition size & offset cmd_ubi: use int64_t volume size for 'ubi create' cmd_ubi: add write.part command, to write a volume in multiple parts
All 4 patches:
Acked-by: Stefan Roese sr@denx.de
Scott, these patches are assigned to you in patchwork. If you are okay with the NAND side (and everything else), then please feel free to push all 4 patches via your repository.
Patch 1 looks OK to me (at least to the extent that it's just bringing code over from Linux). Patch 2 also looks straightforward.
Kyungmin is the UBI maintainer -- the last two patches need his ack.
Yes, Kyungmin is the "official" UBI maintainer. But I have been taking care of all UBI (and UBIFS) related patches in the last years (collecting and pushing them upstream in the u-boot-ubi git repository).
Kyungmin, how should we handle this in the future. Would you like to handle the UBI (and UBIFS) patches yourself? Please let us know how to proceed.
OK, I wasn't aware of that (maybe you should be listed as (co-)custodian?). I guess I can take them, though just in case you'd rather do so (I wasn't the one who assigned them in patchwork):
Acked-by: Scott Wood scottwood@freescale.com
-Scott