Hi Bin,
On 27 January 2015 at 07:00, Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
The base address is found in a different way and the protection bit is also in a different place. Otherwise it is very similar.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
drivers/spi/ich.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- drivers/spi/ich.h | 11 ++++++----- 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
Just a note on this one...for v2 I have done nothing. I think we should move it to device tree as you say but it needs some more thought, as we have register offsets and device types to think about. I will try a few things and test on link also. Once I have this I will send a v3. So this patch will have to sit here until that is done, hopefully only a few days.
Thanks for the quick reviews!
Regards, Simon