Spam detection software, running on the system "lists.denx.de", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
Content preview: Hi Philipp, å¨ 2017/10/6 18:06, Philipp Tomsich åé: >
On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, David Wu wrote: > >> If we include both the rk3288_grf.h
and rv1108_grf.h, there is a >> number of compiling error for redefinition. So we define the reg >> structs of mac_grf at gmac_rockchip.c. Remove the rk**_grf.h files, >> give them own grf offset for their use. > > The reg offset should not be open-coded in gmac_rockchip.c. > > The issue of GRF-header having conflicting definitions was already > discussed on the list, when I initially submitted the RK3368 support. > The decision back then was as follows: > 1/ The GRF files should not contain definitions that are private to > Â Â the IOMUX (e.g. these should go into the pinctrl-driver), etc. [...]
Content analysis details: (5.1 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL [211.157.147.133 listed in psbl.surriel.com] 2.4 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5 RBL: Very bad reputation (-5) [211.157.147.133 listed in bl.mailspike.net] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL Mailspike blacklisted