Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc86xx: use r4 instead of r2 in lock_ram_in_cache and unlock_ram_in_cache

Dear Jon,

in message 12199577553905-git-send-email-nick.spence@freescale.com Nick Spence wrote:

This is needed in unlock_ram_in_cache() because it is called from C and will corrupt the small data area anchor that is kept in R2.

lock_ram_in_cache() is modified similarly as good coding practice, but is not called from C.

Signed-off-by: Nick Spence nick.spence@freescale.com

cpu/mpc86xx/start.S | 8 ++++---- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

I think this patch was not added, nor was any feedback sent?

Please comment.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk