
Hi Neha,
On 16:09-20240508, Neha Malcom Francis wrote:
Hi Manorit,
On 08/05/24 12:56, Manorit Chawdhry wrote:
Update the file with the required nodes from J721s2 R5 file to start using k3-am68-sk-r5 file for AM68.
Signed-off-by: Manorit Chawdhry m-chawdhry@ti.com
What's the motivation behind this patch vs. squashing it into patch 5/6?
Could've squashed it ig, I think developed it in this order so this remained. Would squash it. Also realised that I should be putting that patch before the config split otherwise am68 boot would break again. Would take that up as well in v2. Thanks for the review!
Regards, Manorit
arch/arm/dts/k3-am68-sk-r5-base-board.dts | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/k3-am68-sk-r5-base-board.dts b/arch/arm/dts/k3-am68-sk-r5-base-board.dts index 695aadc287bd..038b08dc3e01 100644 --- a/arch/arm/dts/k3-am68-sk-r5-base-board.dts +++ b/arch/arm/dts/k3-am68-sk-r5-base-board.dts @@ -24,7 +24,8 @@ compatible = "ti,am654-rproc"; reg = <0x0 0x00a90000 0x0 0x10>; power-domains = <&k3_pds 61 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>,
<&k3_pds 202 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
<&k3_pds 202 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>,
resets = <&k3_reset 202 0>; clocks = <&k3_clks 61 1>; assigned-clocks = <&k3_clks 61 1>, <&k3_clks 202 0>;<&k3_pds 4 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
@@ -54,10 +55,12 @@ &secure_proxy_mcu { bootph-pre-ram;
- status = "okay"; }; &secure_proxy_sa3 { bootph-pre-ram;
- status = "okay"; }; &cbass_mcu_wakeup {
-- Thanking You Neha Malcom Francis