On 03/03/2014 06:35 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/2014 12:23 PM, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
On 03/03/2014 05:46 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 04:31:35PM +0100, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
Hello Tom,
On 03/03/2014 03:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/2014 08:45 AM, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
[snip]
Actually automatically generated uuids was the main purpose of this patches. Setting each env variable in this place was the most easy way to make this without a lot of duplicated code.
Why do you treat it like a side-effect? If user wants have own generated uuids - then he can manually set env variables like "uuid_gpt_disk". This actually is not changed - when uuid env is set then it will be used like in current version of code. When user can't generate uuids or just wants to have it automatically generated then my code do this job.
Having been using this code again myself recently, at the high level, this is useful. Having to copy/paste in N UUIDs gets silly. But I also wonder..
[snip]
The one and only reason for put saveenv() here was that if uuids are randomly generated or even just are in environment then I can be sure that next gpt write (e.g. in case of overwrite sector 0 by mistake) is using the same uuids values.
Is this really an important use case to cover?
It can be important if somebody uses UUIDS to boot kernel. In kernel documentation you can find a notice about kernel function name_to_dev_t() - so by command line you can pass uuid for root partition. And the same is for arg "suspend" in kernel cmd line.
Right. But that seems to be putting things in the wrong order. If you need to restore UUIDs to your partition table, you pass in the optional and already known UUID. If you're starting from scratch, by the time the installer is run U-Boot is long gone. And tying things back to the commodity distro stuff, we would be fetching 'root=UUID=...' from some file generated and controlled on the Linux side of things anyhow. To be clear, on the OS side of the equation there's much better ways to find out that partition1 has a UUID of ... than poking the U-Boot environment.
Ok, I understand this.
The way I see things, would it be possible (and not a pain) to make the UUID part of the partition string passed to 'gpt write' optional. If not passed, generate the UUIDs needed. What was used would be seen in 'part list' and so forth.
Ok, so I remove saveenv() from my changes and then we will have two cases:
# gpt write mmc 0 $partitions case 1: envorinment uuids are not set; then: proper uuids variables are set automatically (and printed)
I'd go so far as to say we don't need to print the uuids, they're available via 'part list ...'. A notice that we're generating UUIDs is probably not too spammy.
Ok, I will remove this notice.
case 2: environment uuids are set in env (e.g. some user has put his own env); then users uuids will be used and new uuids are not generated automatically
So this will not change current "gpt" usability - just add new feature, moreover user will be informed about each uuid generation. In case when someone use gpt write by mistake and overwrite uuids by randomly generated then he can easily back to his own uuids by setting each in environment and run gpt write again.
Right. We're making the use case of "fresh device, create new table" easier and we're still allowing "existing device, re-establish old UUIDs".
That's the point.
Yay for agreement then, even if it took a few rounds to see we're on the same side :) I look forward to v2.
Tom -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTFL1DAAoJENk4IS6UOR1WT0EP/12dTZmJGcgZYPgIaRohWAjS Dk3n0PdkPszGic/n5j6un6b8gSck27cTI3aM5YvqRioRBTzw6tvGVoIBOfrtEKdZ EV78iqMq1cozL3o3VdltQlLAzdLzSMwkkEqdD9K4vWpihdr19PPPuaPlV0ynw4/D 6+a1azEqTtznx96bGIH0XLK37ZtVre0/n1+9nd+mQ/swibHQM84GNPdR1L5m3hnJ W80XCnX4wRh238KxXRKr/fqG5w9cVXFcsPWESXzfA+pzi9Jy37dkhMX3CyAGuwS0 QDLz1gg4h6CYGCRulN6rfNYHbLg8YYbJ/5xa4/dSntUW84uZJRMq93T9yKYX+qKM Iezp+EKzoL3Lagz3K2GmwopazEd+0goEHauoQ8QUGDdgMGapXui5NBUNyke78JK8 U/WszX6JOWjagenWHDYiBvPhwIWdGw3FUJVijutKhK8KpKKihC9eDOsdoxz+Lyfu agcZ8rtJ8s6QBEf+xo/PRS+twJeHuTe/CptORm52cXxPMrwOKK17UxrjLJIuDSDl fqVsUaUHmxFmUNU/k5SGI60d/nZGmi7j8EzMMRIK8DJ18Sk0FaBOj/PKo2xBf3RO afbnEQXi831j42V2HSOEEY6rKRzES9d0roSUFIe5EvP/s/1/O1OanimtrXRISjF9 rKXW1zAJZKQlBbYoDOSa =eGvG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
I hope to send V2 tomorrow :) Regards