Hi,
Am Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:37:41 +0100 schrieb Detlev Zundel:
Grepping through my source, I cannot find such a configuration - do you plan to submit this support here sometime?
the code was written by other people and is maintained out-of-uboot-tree in our public CVS.
After unpacking U-Boot 2009.08 these files are copied into the source tree: http://cvs.tuxbox.org/tuxbox/boot/u-boot-tuxbox/
Then this patch is applied http://cvs.tuxbox.org/tuxbox/cdk/Patches/u-boot-2009.08.diff?view=markup
This is the board config used: http://cvs.tuxbox.org/tuxbox/cdk/config/u-boot.dbox2.h.m4?view=markup
I do not know if the code meets U-Boot coding standards, but it works ;) Adding the code to the U-Boot tree makes sense but I think I do not have the needed skills to support it in the future.
Apart from that, I'd strongly start looking for implications of the recent rewrite of the relocation strategy to code not in mainline.
Ah, this is the message I was waiting for. After 2009.08 I did not follow the coding process due to lack of time so I am sure I missed something. Do you mean "[TESTING PATCH] ppc: Relocation test patch" from Sep 12th? Btw, I am using gcc-3.4.6.
Apart from that you could also use the information in our DULG[1] for debugging of U-Boot after relocation and use gdb
I´ll try this as well.
Cheers, rhabarber1848