Re: [U-Boot] [patch] dm355evm NAND support

On Monday 05 October 2009, Tom wrote:

In general it is better to break patches that do multiple things into multiple patches. When you resubmit, please break this patch into its logical parts :

1. NAND
2. Environment

Hmm, my *original* patch necessarily disabled both because there was no persistent store to hold the site-appropriate environment without NAND support. I was waiting for the 4-bit ECC stuff to merge.

So I don't see those two as being cleanly separable.

3. Bootdelay

That makes some sense. Though again, the original reason for disabling it was the absense of persistent storage to hold

However, there's evidently been some other stuff going on since I prepared this patch, so I'll follow up to Sandeep's post.

- Dave