
10 Sep
2010
10 Sep
'10
2:54 p.m.
Dear Andreas Bießmann,
- sprintf(dev->name, "at91_emac");
I would think "emac" is sufficient. That they are on an AT91 system should be obvious to the user.
And if, somehow, in the future, MACB and AT91_EMAC get merged, we would not need to change this again :)
Reinhard