-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 03/13/2013 09:35 AM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
Hi Stefano,
On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 9:01:47 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
On 08/03/2013 15:54, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Tom Rini trini@ti.com wrote:
I think the giant list from Benoit got lost. It's a HUGE thing to change. I think we should just accept that config variables are mixed case, or at least not block this patch on a very large unrelated fixup.
Agreed. Benoit's patch series contains 30 patches and it is at version 9.
It would be better to treat this fixup seperately.
Agree with you, this is my proposal to go on. I think we can also try to split patches for area of competence, with patchsets for i.MX, for ARM and for general. And maybe merging patches that are laready passed the review.
For that, patches 1 until 9 are related to i.MX and mainly to the NAND for i.MX. They get already Scott's ACK. IMHO they are independent from the rest of the patchset and they can be merged now. My proposal is that I merge this part and for the next iteration the number of patches will be reduced ;-)
Currently mx31pdk is broken in mainline and Benoit's series fixes it, so hopefully this can make into 2013.04.
Let's see what we can do ;-)
Yes, it could be split as you suggest, but it has already been reviewed and tested by several people, so I'm not sure if we still have to wait for anything before applying. Albert seemed to agree for this v9 for the arm bits, but he has not given his formal ack yet. Albert, is everything OK for you?
The sooner it is applied, the longer people will have to test before the release.
I am not going to insist that the N different parts come in from N different trees, as long as the relevant acks are present (and it sounds like they are). I will give the whole series another read today just to be sure there's nothing popping out at me.
- -- Tom