On Tuesday 06 March 2012 10:03:19 Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 09:04:41PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 05 March 2012 20:46:40 Graeme Russ wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 05 March 2012 19:15:54 Marek Vasut wrote:
Acked-by: Marek Vasut marex@denx.de
Thanks for your patch, it's on it's way to application :)
generally the maintainer who is picking up the patch and sending on to wolfgang would add a s-o-b rather than a-b tag ...
I've always seen s-o-b as 'I contributed to this patch' and a-b as 'I think this patch looks good (and I may have even compiled it)' and t-b as 'I actually ran this on real hardware'
the Linux kernel wisdom is "s-o-b means 'i handled this patch in transit to merge'" while "a-b means 'looks good to me'"
But didn't we have this discussion a few months ago and the answer was that U-Boot isn't the kernel and custodians don't S-O-B every patch they add, just A-B/T-B (and then it's at their discretion).
could be and i just missed it. personally, i don't see the point in diverging from the workflow that the kernel pioneered and u-boot just picked up, but whatever. -mike