24 Sep
2010
24 Sep
'10
6:58 p.m.
On 2010/09/24 6:45 PM, Rogan Dawes wrote:
On 2010/09/24 7:47 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
On a side note, I do not know of a clear general definition of 'bisectability', which means I could break it yet again unkonwingly. Can you (or anyone, actually :) ) point me to a, or even the, standard definition of 'bisectable' and, if that has a specific meaning, of 'fully bisectable'?
Here's a decent LWN.net article on the topic:
http://lwn.net/Articles/317154/
Rogan