
12 Jan
2015
12 Jan
'15
8:56 a.m.
Hi Gerlando,
On 12.01.2015 08:51, Gerlando Falauto wrote:
thanks for the patch. Please compare it with my v1 revision of the patch: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/150468/ Back then, Simon suggested to use two separate SPI flash operations to avoid the memcpy() operation.
This again could generate unaligned accesses which my patch version does not do.
I guess noone would have guessed about QSPI devices at the time.
Anyway, your patch looks even better than my v1 then, so:
Acked-by: Gerlando Falauto gerlando.falauto@keymile.com
Thanks, Stefan