Hello Scott,
Scott Wood wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 07:05:03AM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hmm... this is the third patch of a patchset, so it apply cleanly, if the other 2 patches are first applied ... or should I base this patch against current nand-flash tree, because this patch goes through your tree?
Ah, I missed that. It's generally preferred, when possible, to not mix custodians in a single patchset -- if you can separate out the NAND driver into its own standalone patch (that doesn't touch any board configs), that'd be ideal. Otherwise, it'll have to wait until the
Hmm.. because it is for the kmeter1 (83xx) based board, it touches also this config file ...
prerequisite patches are merged (or at least acked) by the relevant custodian.
I prefer this way. If this is OK for you I can send a new patch, with your suggestions included ...
bye Heiko