On 09/10/2012 12:35, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
Hi Stefano,
On Monday, October 1, 2012 8:36:25 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
On mxc, each SDHC instance has a dedicated clock, so gd->sdhc_clk is not suitable for the multi-instance use case (initialization made directly with fsl_esdhc_initialize()).
This patch fixes this issue by adding a configuration field for the SDHC input clock frequency.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com Cc: Stefano Babic sbabic@denx.de Cc: Eric Bénard eric@eukrea.com Cc: Otavio Salvador otavio@ossystems.com.br Cc: Fabio Estevam fabio.estevam@freescale.com Cc: Jason Liu r64343@freescale.com Cc: Matt Sealey matt@genesi-usa.com Cc: Andy Fleming afleming@gmail.com
This patch should be applied after (series of series...): http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/187467/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/187468/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/187475/
This patch supersedes http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/187476/ .
Changes for v2:
- Since this patch will go to /next, extend the original patch with
the mxc boards newly added to this branch: mx6qsabreauto and mx6qsabresd.
Did you forget to apply this patch (and http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/187468/ before it) when you applied my mx5 and mx25 clock series, or is it just still in your TODO list?
No, I did not forget. There are two patches for ESDHC. I wanted to be sure that PowerPC boards are not broken and I have rechecked it this morning. They are both ready in my queue to be merged.
If you could apply them before the Nitrogen6X series (in order to avoid a v3 of this patch), I'd be grateful ;) . But if you need more review/test time, of course no problem if this is not possible.
I have some patches ready to be merged, but I sent also a pull request for the -next branch, and it is not yet merged into arm-next. Anyway, I can modify my pull request including further patches, too.
Best regards, Stefano