On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Sourav Poddar sourav.poddar@ti.com wrote:
On Thursday 19 December 2013 02:21 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Sourav Poddarsourav.poddar@ti.com wrote:
On Thursday 19 December 2013 12:49 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Sourav Poddarsourav.poddar@ti.com wrote:
On Thursday 19 December 2013 12:24 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Sourav Poddarsourav.poddar@ti.com wrote: > > Hi Jagan, > > On Thursday 14 November 2013 09:09 PM, Sourav Poddar wrote: >> >> The patch series add support for enabling qspi >> on AM43xx at uboot. >> >> Testing done: >> ------------- >> Wrote a uImage to the flash, read it back and boot the >> kernel. >> >> Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki (1): >> sf: macronix: Add support for MX25L51235F >> >> Sourav Poddar (4): >> am43xx: add qspi support >> am437x_epos_evm: add SPL API, QSPI, and serial flash support >> qspi/spi: Add AM43xx specifics changes >> am43xx: add delay before xfer >> >> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/am33xx/clock_am43xx.c | 1 + >> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/cpu.h | 4 +++- >> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/omap.h | 1 + >> board/ti/am43xx/mux.c | 11 +++++++++++ >> drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c | 2 ++ >> drivers/spi/ti_qspi.c | 29 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- >> include/configs/am43xx_evm.h | 20 >> ++++++++++++++++++++ >> 7 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> > If these patches seems fine to you, can these be picked?
Please send the next version patches - fix the comments as we discussed so far.
I will send the next version. But, what about the delay patch, I tried other stuffs but could not see any thing that helps. So, I will send the delay patch also as of now, to make it work out of mainline.
I am some how OK with that as that change is in ur driver..
Just try this change /* FIXME: comments here... */ +#ifdef CONFIG_AM43XX
- udelay(100);
+#endif
And also write the bug log on commit message(means with out delay)
Try to ass the testing logs on doc/ - for each time you tested a new flash or new driver.
Jagan,
Just realised that this patches depends on AM43x base patches which are in ti-uboot mainline tree. So, what should I do in that case. ?
Send all of them together..!
So, I should send all the base patches also?
AM437x is a new board for denx or already available?
Note: These dependendt patches are already there in tom ti-uboot mainline tree.