
29 Aug
2007
29 Aug
'07
2 a.m.
Dear Ulf,
in message 1187587574.31921.58.camel@elrond.sweden.atmel.com you wrote:
Why not call it dataflash_cs[] and move it into the board code? It already pollutes the namespace, is already board-dependent (hence the #ifdefs) and is apparently buggy?
Excellent idea.
Then the board code is responsible for defining a CFG_MAX_DATAFLASH_BANKS symbol which corresponds with the actual number of entries in the array. Of course, it can still be buggy, but at least it's contained within the board code.
I agree completely.
Who will provide such a patch?
I can do it, in a week or two.
Just to make sure I understand correctly: are you working on this? Any estimates when it might be ready?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
"Probably the best operating system in the world is the [operating
system] made for the PDP-11 by Bell Laboratories."
- Ted Nelson, October 1977