11 Dec
2008
11 Dec
'08
10:16 p.m.
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 11 December 2008 16:01:33 Scott Wood wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
why ? if the hardware doesnt support it, then the user shouldnt be attempting to use it. if they do, that's their fault for doing something stupid.
There's no need to be unnecessarily user-hostile.
there's no need to make u-boot unnecessarily safe for the people who dont understand the system
Oh, please. It's not like it's stopping any reasonable usage (quite the opposite -- removing the check removes a way for the user to find out whether SATA is present); it's just avoiding exposing a device that does not actually exist.
-Scott