Hi Linus,
On 19 October 2015 at 01:15, Linus Walleij linus.walleij@linaro.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
On 16 October 2015 at 15:23, Linus Walleij linus.walleij@linaro.org wrote:
Again: get this merged in the Linux kernel FIRST. Is it?
We had a little bit of a chat about this at ELCE. It would be great to get these changes merged with the kernel but the amount of push-back/energy it requires is still excessive IMO. Any thoughts?
I'm sorry but DT is standardization, and while I know how stinky it is to be first somewhere and having to pave the road for everyone else, in the long run it's worth it. I think when we switched the entire kernel to DT it was to get "more order", and this is the cost that comes with that order: more review.
I will go in and answer the comment on the DT mailing list so there is some push atleast.
Perhaps if we could see some movement then it would provide encouragement to continue. So far I cannot recall seeing a single U-Boot device tree change accepted in the 4 years I've been involved. That's not to say it hasn't happened, and I hope it is just a reflection on my memory rather than the difficulty level.
Regards, Simon