On 26.04.2012 12:57, Anatolij Gustschin wrote: ...
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:01:48 +0300 "Timo Ketola" timo@exertus.fi wrote:
...
What if I implement the driver in my board folder instead?
...
I would prefer not including the driver in the board code. The disadvantage of using the video API is increased code size. If you do not need the framebuffer console, then using the LCD interface is okay.
Then I might resubmit the original patch. Is there basically anything else than the lack of proper attributions?
...
If you are going to update and resubmit your mx2fb patch, then please base your work on the u-boot-samsung tree [1] as there are another lcd driver changes in this tree. Or wait until samsung tree will be merged and then rebase your work on top of u-boot tree.
OK
--
Timo