Am 18/10/2012 20:40, schrieb Troy Kisky:
On 10/8/2012 6:19 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
On 04/10/2012 03:47, Troy Kisky wrote:
Both set_imx_hdr_v1 and set_imx_hdr_v2 perform the same check. Move check to before the set_imx_hdr call.
Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com
v3: split into its own patch
tools/imximage.c | 19 +++++-------------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Stefano Babic sbabic@denx.de
Best regards, Stefano Babic
Are you going to apply this(and 1/32, 2/23) now, or should I resend in the next version with your ack?
Hi Troy,
I think the best way to proceed would be if I apply the patches for the fixes, so that you have not to resend even the patches that will be not touched. And maybe in this "incremental" way we can speed up the whole process.
In my ready-to-be-applied list I marked already the patches from 1/32 up to 5/32. My way to do this is to set them as "under reviewed" in patchworks, because there is not a "ready-to-be-merged" state.
IMHO even patches up to 9/32 can be applied, they are free of comments and we discussed about them in your previous posting. So please wait, I will apply the first set of patches.
Best regards, Stefano