Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message OF5A3AF402.57EFBD26-ONC125767E.007A9CC5-C125767E.007B6427@transmode.se you wrote:
Yes. And all boards that don't need it will suffer from the increased memory footprint.
Sure, but I won't adding these extra call sites as an array of fptrs also add size? Since the new function as smaller than the current list, I would not be surprised if my function idea is smaller in total. Perhaps I am misunderstanding something?
I am just illustrating one way, one that will allow boards better control too as then can define this function as they like/need.
The idea is that boards that want such contrrol can redefine the whole init sequence list - adding what they really need, and omitting what they don't. Zero overhead.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk