Thanks Mr.Wolfgang.
Just a bit more. Is there any reference which provides the functionalities supported by uboot of size 80KB?
Performance option was wrong. It doesn't mean anything to the bootloader.
With Thanks and Best Regards, C.R.Srivatsan
-----Original Message----- From: wd@denx.de [mailto:wd@denx.de] Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 8:59 PM To: Srivatsan Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] Uboot over Redboot
In message 000201c4ce2d$15dfdfa0$4501a8c0@bgcw301 you wrote:
We are in the process of comparing Redboot and Universal BootLoader. My feeling is that Universal boot loader offers more functionalities (POST, active support (pampered by Mr.Wolfgang :-))
and
The list of functions is probably much longer; think of things like VLAN support...
GPL) rather than Redboot. But is there any heavy weighing :-)
difference
(with respect to performance, size) which will enable me to convince
U-Boot is typically between 80 ... 230 kB in size, denpending on your configuration. Performance? Hm... what exactly does this mean for a boot loader?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk