On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:32:29PM +0200, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote:
Hi Tom,
This supports dynamic relocation on MIPS without the need for building a position-independent executable. This notably reduces the code size for all MIPS boards.
The following changes since commit d85ca029f257b53a96da6c2fb421e78a003a9943:
Prepare v2017.07 (2017-07-10 13:07:38 -0400)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-mips.git master
for you to fetch changes up to f653dcd5720c4135607211f7304283d7a8ec3b8a:
MIPS: bootm: Fix broken boot_env_legacy codepath (2017-07-12 22:10:42 +0200)
I'm seeing: mips: + tplink_wdr4300 +(tplink_wdr4300) pfx##hdr32[idx].field = _val; \ +(tplink_wdr4300) ^ +(tplink_wdr4300) ../tools/mips-relocs.c:51:11: note: ?_val? was declared here +(tplink_wdr4300) uint64_t _val; \ +(tplink_wdr4300) ^ +(tplink_wdr4300) ../tools/mips-relocs.c:88:2: note: in expansion of macro ?set_hdr_field? +(tplink_wdr4300) set_hdr_field(p, idx, field, val) +(tplink_wdr4300) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ +(tplink_wdr4300) ../tools/mips-relocs.c:408:3: note: in expansion of macro ?set_phdr_field? +(tplink_wdr4300) set_phdr_field(i, p_filesz, load_sz); +(tplink_wdr4300) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ w+(tplink_wdr4300) ../tools/mips-relocs.c: In function ?main?: w+(tplink_wdr4300) ../tools/mips-relocs.c:77:25: warning: ?_val? may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
for what I suspect is going to be all MIPS. Host tools here are gcc-6.3.