On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 at 03:17:00 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
Hi, Marek
On 3/11/2015 10:03 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 at 01:58:37 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
Hi, Marek
Hi!
On 3/10/2015 9:45 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 at 08:35:46 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
Commit f022d36e8a4517b2a9d25ff2d75bd2459d0c68b1 introduces error register offset.
Change the "char reserved3[59]" to "char reserved3[56]".
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan Peng.Fan@freescale.com
This should probably be applied to 2015.04 .
What are the symptoms of this bug please ?
I just found the reserved3 size is wrong, did not do test.
From the driver, only the entry 'scr' of fsl_esdhc below reserved3 is
used, so the offset of scr is wrong if using `char reserved3[59]`
Uh, is the patch tested at all on real hardware ?
Still not test on real hardware. From commit f022d36e8a4517b2a9d25ff2d75bd2459d0c68b1, " uint adsaddr; /* ADMA system address register */
char reserved2[160]; /* reserved */
char reserved2[100]; /* reserved */uint vendorspec; /* Vendor Specific register */char reserved3[59]; /* reserved */ uint hostver; /* Host controller version register */" It's clear that 160 bytes does not equal with (100 + 4 + 59)bytes.
Hi!
I agree with the change, I'm just not very impressed by patches that are completely untested. If you could do a quick boot on some machine before sending, that'd be nice.
Best regards, Marek Vasut