
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 09:25:31PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
This adds PSCI support for sun6i. So far it only supports the PWR_ON method.
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai wens@csie.org
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/Makefile | 1 + arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/psci_sun6i.S | 276 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 277 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/psci_sun6i.S
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/Makefile b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/Makefile index 85fbc85..4b783e0 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/Makefile +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/Makefile @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_AXP221_POWER) += pmic_bus.o
ifndef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD ifdef CONFIG_ARMV7_PSCI +obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_SUN6I) += psci_sun6i.o obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_SUN7I) += psci_sun7i.o endif endif diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/psci_sun6i.S b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/psci_sun6i.S new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2516804 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/psci_sun6i.S @@ -0,0 +1,276 @@ +/*
- Copyright (C) 2015 - Chen-Yu Tsai
- Author: Chen-Yu Tsai wens@csie.org
- Based on psci_sun7i.S by Marc Zyngier marc.zyngier@arm.com
- This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
- it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
- published by the Free Software Foundation.
- This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
- but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
- MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
- GNU General Public License for more details.
- You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
- along with this program. If not, see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/.
- */
+#include <config.h> +#include <asm/gic.h> +#include <asm/macro.h> +#include <asm/psci.h> +#include <asm/arch/cpu.h>
+/*
- Memory layout:
- SECURE_RAM to text_end :
- ._secure_text section
- text_end to ALIGN_PAGE(text_end):
- nothing
- ALIGN_PAGE(text_end) to ALIGN_PAGE(text_end) + 0x1000)
- 1kB of stack per CPU (4 CPUs max).
- */
- .pushsection ._secure.text, "ax"
- .arch_extension sec
+#define ONE_MS (CONFIG_TIMER_CLK_FREQ / 1000) +#define TEN_MS (10 * ONE_MS) +#define GICD_BASE 0x1c81000 +#define GICC_BASE 0x1c82000
+.macro timer_wait reg, ticks
- @ Program CNTP_TVAL
- movw \reg, #(\ticks & 0xffff)
- movt \reg, #(\ticks >> 16)
- mcr p15, 0, \reg, c14, c2, 0
- isb
- @ Enable physical timer, mask interrupt
- mov \reg, #3
- mcr p15, 0, \reg, c14, c2, 1
- @ Poll physical timer until ISTATUS is on
+1: isb
- mrc p15, 0, \reg, c14, c2, 1
- ands \reg, \reg, #4
- bne 1b
- @ Disable timer
- mov \reg, #0
- mcr p15, 0, \reg, c14, c2, 1
- isb
+.endm
I think I saw some patch to factorize that out. In the Tegra K1 PSCI patches iirc.
+.globl psci_fiq_enter +psci_fiq_enter:
- push {r0-r12}
- @ Switch to secure
- mrc p15, 0, r7, c1, c1, 0
- bic r8, r7, #1
- mcr p15, 0, r8, c1, c1, 0
- isb
- @ Validate reason based on IAR and acknowledge
- movw r8, #(GICC_BASE & 0xffff)
- movt r8, #(GICC_BASE >> 16)
- ldr r9, [r8, #GICC_IAR]
- movw r10, #0x3ff
- movt r10, #0
- cmp r9, r10 @ skip spurious interrupt 1023
- beq out
- movw r10, #0x3fe @ ...and 1022
Maybe we could add some defines for these spurious interrupts values ?
+.globl psci_arch_init +psci_arch_init:
- mov r6, lr
- movw r4, #(GICD_BASE & 0xffff)
- movt r4, #(GICD_BASE >> 16)
- ldr r5, [r4, #GICD_IGROUPRn]
- bic r5, r5, #(1 << 15) @ SGI15 as Group-0
- str r5, [r4, #GICD_IGROUPRn]
- mov r5, #0 @ Set SGI15 priority to 0
- strb r5, [r4, #(GICD_IPRIORITYRn + 15)]
- add r4, r4, #0x1000 @ GICC address
- mov r5, #0xff
- str r5, [r4, #GICC_PMR] @ Be cool with non-secure
- ldr r5, [r4, #GICC_CTLR]
- orr r5, r5, #(1 << 3) @ Switch FIQEn on
- str r5, [r4, #GICC_CTLR]
- mrc p15, 0, r5, c1, c1, 0 @ Read SCR
- orr r5, r5, #4 @ Enable FIQ in monitor mode
- bic r5, r5, #1 @ Secure mode
- mcr p15, 0, r5, c1, c1, 0 @ Write SCR
- isb
- bl psci_get_cpu_id @ CPU ID => r0
- bl psci_get_cpu_stack_top @ stack top => r0
- mov sp, r0
- bx r6
- .globl psci_text_end
Isn't it exactly the same function than the A20's? Maybe that can be shared?
Thanks, Maxime