31 Aug
2022
31 Aug
'22
7:44 p.m.
On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 09:55, Quentin Schulz foss+uboot@0leil.net wrote:
From: Quentin Schulz quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com
The binary is looked on the system by the suffix of the packer class. This means binman was looking for btool_gzip on the system and not gzip.
Therefore, let's pass "gzip" as the name so that it can be found and used.
Fixes: 0f369d79925a ("binman: Add gzip bintool") Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com
tools/binman/btool/btool_gzip.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
Oops! I wonder how we could test this? One way would be to require those tools to be present and write a test that reads the version, I suppose.
Regards, Simon