8 May
2008
8 May
'08
8:53 p.m.
In message Pine.LNX.4.64.0805081824310.5839@axis700.grange you wrote:
Of course, your solution will work with multiple, different SPI controllers while mine won't, but is that really necessary?
Your solution comes with more error checking as well, which might be a good thing, but since it comes with a cost of additional memory and flash footprint, I think it should be optional. Maybe we could provide some library functions to simplify the drivers that want this?
I see. Well, I don't have a strong preference. So, either we need more votes, or the one who implements it decides:-)
That was two pros - did I miss any cons ?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
I don't know if it's what you want, but it's what you get. :-)
- Larry Wall in 10502@jpl-devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV