March 2006 - U-Boot

Re: [DNX#2006040142000553] [U-Boot-Users] Patch to build csope database in th [...]
by DENX Support System 01 Apr '06

01 Apr '06

Hello list, inside the automatic U-Boot patch tracking system a new ticket [DNX#2006040142000553] was created: <snip> > Re-submit. Accessing the file over a Samba share even after UNIX to DOS > conversion corrupted the file. Patch tested against latest cscope from > Sourceforge. (had some problem with clipboard or file transfer over > SAMBA. Ftp transfer worked. Also, cut-N-paste between edit and Outlook > Did not work. Opening file with notepad and past worked.). > > --- u-boot-1.1.3/Makefile 2005-10-19 18:04:22.000000000 -0700 > +++ Makefile 2005-10-21 09:51:53.000000000 -0700 > @@ -193,6 +193,10 @@ > net disk rtc dtt drivers drivers/sk98lin > common \ > $ -name CVS -prune $ -o $ -name '*.[ch]' -print > $` > > +cscope: > + find . -name "*.[cCsSh]" -print > cscope.files > + cscope -b -R -u -q > + > System.map: u-boot > $(NM) -A -l $< | \ > grep -v '$compiled$\|$\.o$$$\|$ [aUw] > $\|$\.\.ng$$$\|$LASH[RL]DI$' | \ > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, > discussions, > and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot-Users mailing list > U-Boot-Users(a)lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users </snip> Your U-Boot support team

1 0

Re: [DNX#2006040142000535] [U-Boot-Users] Xilinx ML403/PPC U-Boot support
by DENX Support System 01 Apr '06

01 Apr '06

Hello list, inside the automatic U-Boot patch tracking system a new ticket [DNX#2006040142000535] was created: <snip> > Peter Ryser wrote: > > > >> Careful. ML403 reference design (as-is) is not using the Xilinx option > >> of using side-by-side data access (32-bit fetch out of a single 16-bit > >> flash), so XIP (execution in place) is evidently NOT supported in ML403. > >> However, I had a new bit file built with side-by-side data access > >> enabled, but haven't yet execute out of flash (no need because ML403 has > >> a big memory.) But it correctly fetches 32-bit now. Ping me in a week > >> on my progress with XIP and flash. > >> > > Hmm, why do you need that? The ML403 has two flash chips and with that > > allows 32 bit wide accesses. That allows you to access the whole flash > > space and should give you much better performance than executing out of > > a 16 bit wide flash. > > > > Brain fart. My ML403-derived board dropped only one flash chip down to > one.... > > Please disregard note of side-by-side data fetch and ML403. This is not > applicable toward ML403 reference design. XIP SHOULD BE possible out of > linear flash, however, time is saved in the long run if you preload it > into DDR SDRAM firstly. > > True on the better execution performance using two flash chips BUT no > need for XIP here on my part. > > > S. Egbert > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log > files > for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes > searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot-Users mailing list > U-Boot-Users(a)lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users </snip> Your U-Boot support team

1 0

Re: [DNX#2006040142000517] [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] MPC8xx: Parameter Area Relo [...]
by DENX Support System 01 Apr '06

01 Apr '06

Hello list, inside the automatic U-Boot patch tracking system a new ticket [DNX#2006040142000517] was created: <snip> > Hello Wolfgang, > > This patch adds full support for parameter area relocation on MPC8xx. > This is needed if you want to simultaneously use devices that have > overlapping parameter areas, such as SCC1/I2C, SCC2/SPI, SCC3/SMC1, > SCC4/SMC2 (SCCx should be in Ethernet mode). The details are in > doc/README.mpc8xx_upatch. > > Both ROM-based relocation solution and microcode patch are supported. > Selection is automatic. > > In addition to that, this patch contains some minor enhancements for > MPC8xx SPI driver and "sspi" command, which were kind of difficult to > separate (I had to do everything together in order to be able to test > it). > > Changelog entry > > * Added support for I2C, SPI and SMC parameter area relocation on MPC8xx > * Modified MPC8xx SPI driver to make it compatible with sspi command > * Minor enhanements to "sspi" command for better compatibility with > "eeprom" command > Patch by Vladimir Gurevich <vag(a)paulidav.org> > > Thanks, > Vladimir </snip> Your U-Boot support team

1 0

Re: [DNX#2006040142000526] [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH-4/8]Blackfin support - Add s [...]
by DENX Support System 01 Apr '06

01 Apr '06

Hello list, inside the automatic U-Boot patch tracking system a new ticket [DNX#2006040142000526] was created: <snip> > The patch is based on following point in the current U-boot git > repository. > ============================================================ > commit 6624b687bc2b747233090e67628df37d1c84ed17 > Author: Wolfgang Denk <wd(a)pollux.(none)> > Date: Wed Feb 22 10:25:39 2006 +0100 > > Rename SMMACO4 board into smmaco4 for consistency with Linux. > ============================================================ > > Changelog entry: > * Added cpu/bf533 directory for blackfin platform > Patch by Aubrey.Li <aubreylee(a)gmail.com> > > Thanks, > -Aubrey </snip> Your U-Boot support team

1 0

Re: [DNX#2006040142000482] [U-Boot-Users] NAND flash support
by DENX Support System 01 Apr '06

01 Apr '06

Hello list, inside the automatic U-Boot patch tracking system a new ticket [DNX#2006040142000482] was created: <snip> > On 11/1/05, Ladislav Michl <ladis(a)linux-mips.org> wrote: > > Could you please provide a patch? > > I've tried to make it as clean as possible, but there still may be > some junk I used for debugging. > > > > > What version of MTD code are you using in your Linux kernel? I'm just > > updating U-Boot code to be based on what's contained in 2.6.14, which > > _may_ address some problems people were reporting before. I hope to get > > time to send update next week. > > I use kernel 2.6.12.3 and except a wrong ID for 512Mb NAND flashe, the > MTD code contained there works fine for me. > > > -- > Sincerely Yours, > Mike. </snip> Your U-Boot support team

1 0

Re: [DNX#2006040142000508] [U-Boot-Users] build error for omap5912osk on u-bo [...]
by DENX Support System 01 Apr '06

01 Apr '06

Hello list, inside the automatic U-Boot patch tracking system a new ticket [DNX#2006040142000508] was created: <snip> > Hi, > > > While building u-boot-1.1.4 for omap5912osk, I got following error: > ... > > What else do I have to #define other than CFG_FLASH_CFI_DRIVER? > > Attached is the patch I'm using for omap5912osk on u-boot-1.1.4. > > With this patch (and other patch I posted), u-boot-1.1.4 build for > omap5912osk is successful. > > > Best Regards, > > HK. > -- </snip> Your U-Boot support team

1 0

Re: [DNX#2006040142000491] [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Get rid of warnings in 48bi [...]
by DENX Support System 01 Apr '06

01 Apr '06

Hello list, inside the automatic U-Boot patch tracking system a new ticket [DNX#2006040142000491] was created: <snip> > CHANGELOG: > * Remove some compiler warnings when using 32 bit blocknumbers in 48bit > LBA mode > (CONFIG_LBA48 set and CFG_64BIT_LBA not set) > > Patch by Rune Torgersen 29 Dec 2005 </snip> Your U-Boot support team

1 0

Re: [DNX#2006040142000473] [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] trivial bugfix, #ifdef CONF [...]
by DENX Support System 01 Apr '06

01 Apr '06

Hello list, inside the automatic U-Boot patch tracking system a new ticket [DNX#2006040142000473] was created: <snip> > The ifdef around cpu_init_crit was added, otherwise a reference to > "lowlevel_init" still exists and could not be resolved by the linker. > > Best regards > Peter Menzebach > > > CHANGELOG: > Patch by Peter Menzebach, 2005-10-13 > ifdef CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT around > cpu_init_crit added in cpu/arm920t/start.S </snip> Your U-Boot support team

1 0

Re: [DNX#2006040142000455] [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] fpga support + extra flash [...]
by DENX Support System 01 Apr '06

01 Apr '06

Hello list, inside the automatic U-Boot patch tracking system a new ticket [DNX#2006040142000455] was created: <snip> > Hi, > > This patch against current CVS, adds FPGA support for the xsengine > board. I > also added a few Spansion flash types of the N-family. > > Thanks. > Kurt </snip> Your U-Boot support team

1 0

Re: [DNX#2006040142000464] [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] AT91RM9200 Ethernet initial [...]
by DENX Support System 01 Apr '06

01 Apr '06

Hello list, inside the automatic U-Boot patch tracking system a new ticket [DNX#2006040142000464] was created: <snip> > Hi, > > the AT91RM9200 on-chip Ethernet interface is explicitly initialized > to use promiscuous mode. > > This is probably due to a bug in line 183 of > cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ether.c which was supposed to clear the > statistics counters but instead erroneously disabled reception of > broadcast packets - so the driver later enables promiscuous mode in > order to receive such broadcasts, like e.g. DHCP responses. > > The patch below fixes the original bug and lets the interface > run in normal (non-promiscuous) mode, which should improve > performance on networks with heavy traffic. > > Cheers > Anders > > Signed-off-by: Anders Larsen <alarsen(a)rea.de> > > CHANGELOG: > Fix the initialization of the AT91RM9200 ethernet interface > to use non-promiscuous mode > Patch by Lars Munch, 24 Oct 2005 > > --- > > cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ether.c | 5 ++--- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ether.c > b/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ether.c > index ca5b7d1..eb9dd76 100644 > --- a/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ether.c > +++ b/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ether.c > @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ int eth_init (bd_t * bd) > > *AT91C_PMC_PCER = 1 << AT91C_ID_EMAC; /* Peripheral Clock Enable > Register */ > > - p_mac->EMAC_CFG |= AT91C_EMAC_CSR; /* Clear statistics */ > + p_mac->EMAC_CTL |= AT91C_EMAC_CSR; /* Clear statistics */ > > /* Init Ehternet buffers */ > for (i = 0; i < RBF_FRAMEMAX; i++) { > @@ -197,8 +197,7 @@ int eth_init (bd_t * bd) > p_mac->EMAC_RBQP = (long) (&rbfdt[0]); > p_mac->EMAC_RSR &= ~(AT91C_EMAC_RSR_OVR | AT91C_EMAC_REC | > AT91C_EMAC_BNA); > > - p_mac->EMAC_CFG = (p_mac->EMAC_CFG | AT91C_EMAC_CAF | AT91C_EMAC_NBC) > - & ~AT91C_EMAC_CLK; > + p_mac->EMAC_CFG &= ~AT91C_EMAC_CLK; > > #ifdef CONFIG_AT91C_USE_RMII > p_mac->EMAC_CFG |= AT91C_EMAC_RMII; > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. > Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course > Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 > Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot-Users mailing list > U-Boot-Users(a)lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users </snip> Your U-Boot support team

1 0